yesleaks

Court cases can be a great source of information that would otherwise go unnoticed. In this regard, when a large media company such as bustle digital group (bustle, romper and elite daily) is sued, you can look behind the scenes.

In that case, against bdg is being sued by a man called paul kim. The new york team's case isn't all that exciting at first.

Kim says he helped create elite daily, a web platform dedicated to millennials. College - and he was promised a 15% stake in the company. According to the lawsuit, he was never paid, so he is now taking legal action.

What is interesting is that kim claims that bustle paid about half a million greenbacks for the acquisition elite daily at the beginning of 2017, which is significantly more expensive. Than estimated at the time of sale.

In fact, multiple reports said that at no time would bustle pay more than $40 million - a price that the daily mail reportedly paid back three years back. When elite daily was present in its heyday. Finally, by 2017, elite daily was considered a former one (its traffic dropped significantly, and dailymail called it "useless"). The terms of the bustle transaction were never made public.

Even more exciting than the alleged financial deal, which is by no means considered proof of the actual price of the trade, is the origin story of elite daily, which we present with.

You see, elite daily was a prodigy when it first appeared. A couple of college guys started a website to be the voice of their generation, and thanks to vk and fb sharing, it worked. “From the start, we focused on creating a digital media platform that authentically represents the experience of the millennium,” said one of the founders of elite daily, david arabov (who bore the name appears in the lawsuit) in an interview in 2014.

But according to the lawsuit, elite daily didn't start out as the voice of the millennials, sofiiiiagomez leaks it was more like a cheap finance game for the lustful rich.

Kim claims that even 7 years ago, when the founders of elite daily first approached + with a proposal to create a website, they wanted to call it elite wall street, “so that naked women give advice on promotions to attract an older male audience.”</>

Legal documents received by the entity.

This is the site that kim quotes he started building. He even looked at two sketches of the elite wall street logos (would love to see those logos!). Then, after 1-2 months, according to him, he advised the founders to change the name from elite wall street to elite daily. He claims he also suggested that they refocus from soft tips for selling pornography to millennial behavior.

So i couldn't imagine. , And plaintiff also submitted his own official verdict on what is capable of selling a particular resource, including changing the name from elite wall street to elite daily and modifying the concept from a soft porn resource to a serious website that attracts millions of subscribers.” / >

Legal documents received by the entity.

Of course, the rest is history. Elite daily made two sales for about 50% and fifty million dollars so that its male founders laughed all the way to the bank. Elite daily was founded by several partners in their 20s who ostensibly wanted to launch a soft roller resource and found a female millennial lifestyle brand in their favorite way. “Elite daily is https://yesleaks.net/tags/hoopsydaisy/ a site for the fair sex to discover the world and themselves,” reads the “about the magazine” section.